I understand your response, but I am not completely devoted to this work alone. I have tasks in life and when I have any free time I try to create pictures and upload them.
By @Worker404
So because you do not have a lot of time, you think you are allowed to upload bad assets.
Next time, you buy a car, the vendor will sell you a car with errors built in. When you complain about the errors, the vendor will say, sorry, but of course, building a car with no errors is very difficult, and our people in manufacturing do not have a lot of time. They will remove the bad cars after they have built more cars to sell.
You will now say that a car and an asset to licence are not the same, and you are right.
But:
As a professional, I'm searching the database for the ideal image. I spend easily a day or two researching the correct topic. I create a model (or several models) to be presented to the customer. The customer, after internal consultation with his bosses, gives me the OK for one design. I licence the full-scale image, and I detect your multiple errors. That's for a small job easily a creative week, that I can scrap. Let's say that that is $2000 or more of lost earnings. Because the customer will not pay for my work, and to the contrary, they will be angry because they just convinced their boss of my concept. They will need to go back to the boss and tell them that I can't deliver before the deadline because you think that uploading bad assets is OK. I will lose the customer, or I will need to do some magic because you did not devote the time you should have devoted to correcting the assets.
(To be honest, I would exclude AI from my searches because many people are thinking like you and are wanting to make the quick bucks. They would rather not invest the time needed, and unfortunately, Adobe does a bad job checking the generative AI assets. So, I will miss all the assets created by the serious contributors.)
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
